October (Web-only) 2000

ARTICLE TOOLS

Find similar articles E-mail this page

A leading animal rights theologian, Andrew Linzey, has spoken out against moves to include symbolic sacrifice of animals in Christian worship, describing it as "subversive of the Gospel."

Some Christians in Africa have suggested that traditional local non-Christian rituals such as sacrificing sheep and cows should be included in services to give an authentic indigenous dimension to worship. Earlier this year, Buti Tlhagale, the Roman Catholic Archbishop of Bloemfontein, South Africa, suggested that blood libations to honour ancestors should be incorporated into the Mass.

"Even sophisticated black Christians slaughter animals as part of their tradition of communing with their ancestors at important occasions in their lives," the Catholic archbishop said. "Is there a way to integrate this custom with their Christian belief as a step towards meaningful inculturation?"

But Linzey, speaking to ENI from his home in Oxford, England, disagreed. "I support inculturation as a principle, but it would be an odd view to argue that everything about a culture is right."

Professor Linzey, an Anglican priest who was appointed to the world's first academic post in theology and animal welfare, based at Oxford University, and is now a member of the faculty of theology of Oxford University, continued: "Animal sacrifice is subversive of the Gospel of the one true sacrifice of Christ by suggesting that something has to be added."

Blood sacrifices were one of the principle targets of Western Christian missionaries in 19th-century Africa. They saw the ritual killing of animals and in some areas of human beings as an encouragement to superstition. Many Christians have subsequently deplored the heavy-handed way in which early European and North American ...